Focus the review
Filter tasks by pupil, cohort, subject and recorded status to find the work you need to check.
Report review
& readiness
A thoughtful review. A clearer report.
Bring the right people into the reporting process. Review attainment and comments, resolve questions and approve work with a clear record of each decision.
Know what is ready. See what needs attention.
Keep reporting work
moving with purpose.
See the responsibility
Keep the assigned preparer and reviewer visible alongside each subject contribution.
Read the submitted revision
Review attainment, comments, next steps and the supporting evidence in context.
Return useful feedback
Explain what needs attention so the preparer can revise the contribution and submit it again.
Approve the checked version
Record approval against the exact revision, with checks on the evidence and reporting context.
Retain the decisions
Follow earlier revisions and review decisions as the contribution develops.
Useful feedback makes the next revision better
Review the detail.
Make the next step clear.
Bring attainment and teacher comments into the same conversation. A specific next step helps turn a reporting comment into something a student can act on.
- Inspect the subject result and the submitted wording together.
- Return a contribution with clear staff feedback when it needs refinement.
- Review the corrected revision and retain the earlier decision in history.
A considered route to approval
Keep each decision connected.
Submit
The preparer submits a subject contribution for review.
Review
The reviewer checks its attainment, wording and evidence.
Refine
If returned, the preparer responds with a revised submission.
Approve
The authorised reviewer approves the exact revision that was checked.
From subject work to family access
Three stages.
A clear responsibility at each.
Subject approval
Confirm that the subject contribution and its evidence are ready to use.
Complete-report review
Bring approved subjects and selected tutor or attendance information into the pupil’s report edition.
Publication
Release the completed report through the school’s authorised publication workflow.
Approving a subject contribution keeps it within the school’s reporting process until the later completion and publication steps.
For your team
A shared standard.
A clear contribution.
Teachers & tutors
Prepare useful reporting content.
Submit assigned work and respond to feedback with a revised contribution.
Academic reviewers
Check the meaning behind the result.
Review attainment, wording and evidence, then approve or return the submitted revision.
School leaders
Coordinate the reporting process.
Follow responsibilities and current readiness before moving towards complete reports and publication.
Before a report is ready
Know what approval means.
Clarify returned work, reviewer responsibilities and what happens when evidence changes after submission.
Can reviewers send work back for changes?
Yes. Reviewers record staff feedback explaining what needs changing. The preparer can revise and submit again, with the earlier decision retained.
Can a teacher approve their own work?
Teacher-led policies can allow this when the teacher has assigned review authority. Reviewed cycles require a reviewer who did not contribute to the submitted content.
Does approving every subject publish the report?
Complete-report review and authorised publication are separate steps. Subject approval alone does not release a report to students or families.
What happens if evidence changes after submission?
The system checks for changed evidence and reporting context. When the submitted revision is no longer current, an updated revision is needed before its approval can remain valid.
Keep exploring
One school. More connected possibilities.
Report review & readiness
Give every report a considered review.
Connect teacher insight, clear feedback and a dependable approval process.