Define numeric bands
Set school grade codes, labels and minimum percentages, with each threshold beginning the next band.
A shared language for achievement. A clear basis for reporting.
Give achievement a consistent language across your school. Define the scales and reporting rules your teachers use, then keep each reporting cycle connected to the reviewed version.
Start with how your school describes progress
Set school grade codes, labels and minimum percentages, with each threshold beginning the next band.
Build ordered teacher-judgement labels for subjects that use descriptive attainment instead of percentages.
Maintain academy-wide definitions or campus-specific versions for the reporting context they serve.
Explore reporting cyclesThe rules behind a reported result
Use reporting policies to select the result type and scale, define evidence buckets where needed and set the school’s effort and forecast labels. Keep the approval approach clear for the people preparing and reviewing results.
A stable basis for every reporting cycle
Give staff a consistent reference for the reporting period. Activating a definition fixes that version’s content, while a later change begins as a new revision for review.
See report review & readinessDefine the scale or policy and review its meaning, calculation rules and scope.
Make that version available for selection in the appropriate reporting context.
Create a new revision for future use. Creating a revision does not automatically replace the version selected for an existing reporting cycle.
For your team
Agree the reporting framework.
Define the scales, result approach and reporting rules that reflect the school’s assessment policy.
Keep the setup deliberate.
Prepare and activate definitions in the right scope, then select the reviewed versions for reporting.
Work from the same definitions.
Use the assigned scale and policy while preparing, checking and explaining each reported result.
Defining achievement consistently
See how a school-owned grading framework becomes a stable reference for reporting.
Yes. Numeric scales define percentage bands beginning at 0%, using school grade codes and labels. Teacher-judgement scales use ordered descriptors without percentage thresholds. Choose the appropriate scale for the subject’s reporting policy.
Numeric policies use evidence buckets whose weights total 100%. Each bucket can pool earned and available points or weight each selected task. The final percentage is rounded half up to two decimal places before the grade band is selected.
Missing, unreleased, absent or excused evidence blocks the numeric calculation for review. It is not silently replaced by zero or redistributed across the other evidence. An explicit Not assessed outcome can be enabled in the reporting policy.
An active definition version stays fixed. Create and review a new revision for future selection. Creating a revision does not automatically replace the version selected for an existing cycle. Archiving removes a version from new selections while keeping its existing uses readable.
Keep exploring
Grading scales & reporting definitions
Connect your school’s language for achievement with reviewed rules and stable reporting versions.