Grading scales &
reporting definitions

A shared language for achievement. A clear basis for reporting.

Give achievement a consistent language across your school. Define the scales and reporting rules your teachers use, then keep each reporting cycle connected to the reviewed version.

Start with how your school describes progress

Numeric bands.
Teacher judgement.
A consistent framework.

Define numeric bands

Set school grade codes, labels and minimum percentages, with each threshold beginning the next band.

Use meaningful descriptors

Build ordered teacher-judgement labels for subjects that use descriptive attainment instead of percentages.

Choose the appropriate scope

Maintain academy-wide definitions or campus-specific versions for the reporting context they serve.

Explore reporting cycles

The rules behind a reported result

Connect the scale
to the reporting approach.

Use reporting policies to select the result type and scale, define evidence buckets where needed and set the school’s effort and forecast labels. Keep the approval approach clear for the people preparing and reviewing results.

  • Choose numeric results or teacher-judgement outcomes.
  • For numeric results, define evidence buckets whose weights total 100%.
  • Use pooled points or explicit task weighting within each evidence bucket.

For your team

A common reference
from subject result to school report.

Academic leaders

Agree the reporting framework.

Define the scales, result approach and reporting rules that reflect the school’s assessment policy.

Reporting administrators

Keep the setup deliberate.

Prepare and activate definitions in the right scope, then select the reviewed versions for reporting.

Teachers & reviewers

Work from the same definitions.

Use the assigned scale and policy while preparing, checking and explaining each reported result.

Defining achievement consistently

How do scales, calculations and revisions work?

See how a school-owned grading framework becomes a stable reference for reporting.

Can we use both numeric and descriptive grading?

Yes. Numeric scales define percentage bands beginning at 0%, using school grade codes and labels. Teacher-judgement scales use ordered descriptors without percentage thresholds. Choose the appropriate scale for the subject’s reporting policy.

How is a numeric subject result calculated?

Numeric policies use evidence buckets whose weights total 100%. Each bucket can pool earned and available points or weight each selected task. The final percentage is rounded half up to two decimal places before the grade band is selected.

What happens if required assessment evidence is missing?

Missing, unreleased, absent or excused evidence blocks the numeric calculation for review. It is not silently replaced by zero or redistributed across the other evidence. An explicit Not assessed outcome can be enabled in the reporting policy.

Can we change an active scale during a reporting cycle?

An active definition version stays fixed. Create and review a new revision for future selection. Creating a revision does not automatically replace the version selected for an existing cycle. Archiving removes a version from new selections while keeping its existing uses readable.

Grading scales & reporting definitions

Give every reported result a consistent foundation.

Connect your school’s language for achievement with reviewed rules and stable reporting versions.

Start your free trial